Q5.
Will we go to heaven when
we die?
NO
Answer
Click here to go to YES answer
Click
on a question below to go directly to that question. |
||||
The restitution foretold by the
apostles and prophets must follow the ransom as the just and logical sequence.
According to God's arrangement in providing a ransom, all mankind, unless they
wilfully resist the saving power of the Great Deliverer, must be delivered from
the original penalty, "of corruption," death, else the ransom does
not avail for all.
Paul's reasoning on the subject is most clear and emphatic. He says (Rom. 14:9),
"For to this end Christ died and lived again, that he might be Lord [ruler,
controller] of both the dead and the living." That is to say, the object
of our Lord's death and resurrection was not merely to bless and rule over and
restore the living of mankind, but to give him authority over, or full control
of, the dead as well as the living, insuring the benefits of his ransom as much
to the one as to the other. He "gave himself a ransom [a corresponding
price] for all," in order that he might bless all, and give to every man
an individual trial for life. To claim that he gave "ransom for all,"
and yet to claim that only a mere handful of the ransomed ones will ever receive
any benefit from it, is absurd; for it would imply either that God accepted
the ransom-price and then unjustly refused to grant the release of the redeemed,
or else that the Lord, after redeeming all, was either unable or unwilling to
carry out the original benevolent design. The unchangeableness of the divine
plans, no less than the perfection of the divine justice and love, repels and
contradicts such a thought, and gives us assurance that the original and benevolent
plan, of which the "ransom for all" was the basis, will be fully carried
out in God's "due time," and will bring to faithful believers the
blessing of release from the Adamic condemnation and an opportunity to return
to the rights and liberties of sons of God, as enjoyed before sin and the curse.
Let the actual benefits and results of the ransom be clearly seen, and all objections
to its being of universal application must vanish. The "ransom for all"
given by "the man Christ Jesus" does not give or guarantee everlasting
life or blessing to any man; but it does guarantee to every man another opportunity
or trial for life everlasting. The first trial of man, which resulted in the
loss of the blessings at first conferred, is really turned into a blessing of
experience to the loyal-hearted, by reason of the ransom which God has provided.
But the fact that men are ransomed from the first penalty does not guarantee
that they may not, when individually tried for everlasting life, fail to render
the obedience without which none will be permitted to live everlastingly. Man,
by reason of present experience with sin and its bitter penalty, will be fully
forewarned; and when, as a result of the ransom, he is granted another, an individual
trial, under the eye and control of him who so loved him as to give his life
for him, and who would not that any should perish, but that all should turn
to God and live, we may be sure that only the wilfully disobedient will receive
the penalty of the second trial. That penalty will be the second death, from
which there will be no ransom, no release, because there would be no object
for another ransom or a further trial. All will have fully seen and tasted both
good and evil; all will have witnessed and experienced the goodness and love
of God; all will have had a full, fair, individual trial for life, under most
favorable conditions. More could not be asked, and more will not be given. That
trial will decide forever who would be righteous and holy under a thousand trials;
and it will determine also who would be unjust, and unholy and filthy still,
under a thousand trials.
It would be useless to grant another trial for life under exactly the same circumstances;
but though the circumstances of the tried ones will be different, more favorable,
the terms or conditions of their individual trial for life will be the same
as in the Adamic trial. The law of God will remain the same--it changes not.
It will still say, "The soul that sinneth, it shall die" and the condition
of man will be no more favorable, so far as surroundings are concerned, than
the conditions and surroundings in Eden; but the great difference will be the
increased knowledge. The experience with evil, contrasted with the experience
with good, which will accrue to each during the trial of the coming age, will
constitute the advantage by reason of which the results of the second trial
will differ so widely from the results of the first, and on account of which
divine Wisdom and Love provided the "ransom for all," and thus guaranteed
to all the blessing of a new trial. No more favorable trial, no more favorable
law, no more favorable conditions or circumstances, can in any way be conceived
of as reasons for another ransom or a further trial for any beyond the Millennial
age.
The ransom given does not excuse sin in any; it does not propose to count sinners
as saints, and usher them thus into everlasting bliss. It merely releases the
accepting sinner from the first condemnation and its results, both direct and
indirect, and places him again on trial for life, in which trial his own wilful
obedience or wilful disobedience will decide whether he may or may not have
life everlasting.
Nor should it be assumed, as so many seem disposed to assume, that all those
who live in a state of civilization, and see or possess a Bible, have thus a
full opportunity or trial for life. It must be remembered that the fall has
not injured all of Adam's children alike. Some have come into the world so weak
and depraved as to be easily blinded by the god of this world, Satan, and led
captive by besetting and surrounding sin; and all are more or less under this
influence, so that, even when they would do good, evil is present and more powerful
through surroundings, etc., and the good which they would do is almost impossible,
while the evil which they would not do is almost unavoidable.
Small indeed is the number of those who in the present time truly and experimentally
learn of the liberty wherewith Christ makes free those who accept of his ransom,
and put themselves under his control for future guidance. Yet only these few,
the Church, called out and tried beforehand for the special purpose of being
co-workers with God in blessing the world--witnessing now, and ruling, blessing
and judging the world in its age of trial--yet enjoy to any extent the benefits
of the ransom, or are now on trial for life. These few have reckoned to them
(and they receive by faith) all the blessings of restitution which will be provided
for the world during the coming age. These, though not perfect, not restored
to Adam's condition actually, are treated in such a manner as to compensate
for the difference. Through faith in Christ they are reckoned perfect, and hence
are restored to perfection and to divine favor, as though no longer sinners.
Their imperfections and unavoidable weaknesses, being offset by the ransom,
are not imputed to them, but are covered by the Redeemer's perfection. Hence
the Church's trial, because of her reckoned standing in Christ, is as fair as
that which the world will have in its time of trial. The world will all be brought
to a full knowledge of the truth, and each one, as he accepts of its provisions
and conditions, will be treated no longer as a sinner, but as a son, for whom
all the blessings of restitution are intended.
One difference between the experiences of the world under trial and the experiences
of the Church during her trial will be that the obedient of the world will begin
at once to receive the blessings of restitution by a gradual removal of their
weaknesses--mental and physical; whereas the Gospel Church, consecrated to the
Lord's service even unto death, goes down into death and gets her perfection
instantaneously in the first resurrection. Another difference between the two
trials is in the more favorable surroundings of the next age as compared with
this, in that then society, government, etc., will be favorable to righteousness,
rewarding faith and obedience, and punishing sin; whereas now, under the prince
of this world, the Church's trial is under circumstances unfavorable to righteousness,
faith, etc. But this, we have seen, is to be compensated for in the prize of
the glory and honor of the divine nature offered to the Church, in addition
to the gift of everlasting life.
Adam's death was sure, though it was reached by nine hundred and thirty years
of dying. Since he was himself dying, all his children were born in the same
dying condition and without right to life; and, like their parents, they all
die after a more or less lingering process. It should be remembered, however,
that it is not the pain and suffering in dying, but death--the extinction of
life--in which the dying culminates, that is the penalty of sin. The suffering
is only incidental to it, and the penalty falls on many with but little or no
suffering. It should further be remembered that when Adam forfeited life, he
forfeited it forever; and not one of his posterity has ever been able to expiate
his guilt or to regain the lost inheritance. All the race are either dead or
dying. And if they could not expiate their guilt before death, they certainly
could not do it when dead--when not in existence. The penalty of sin was not
simply to die, with the privilege and right thereafter of returning to life.
In the penalty pronounced there was no intimation of release. (Gen. 2:17) The
restitution, therefore, is an act of free grace or favor on God's part. And
as soon as the penalty had been incurred, even while it was being pronounced,
the free favor of God was intimated, which, when realized, will so fully declare
his love.
Had it not been for the gleam of hope, afforded by the statement that the seed
of the woman should bruise the serpent's head, the race would have been in utter
despair; but this promise indicated that God had some plan for their benefit.
When to Abraham God swore that in his seed all the families of the earth should
be blessed, it implied a resurrection or restitution of all; for many were then
dead, and others have since died, unblessed. Nevertheless, the promise is still
sure: all shall be blessed when the times of restitution or refreshing shall
come. (Acts 3:19) Moreover, since blessing indicates favor, and since God's
favor was withdrawn and his curse came instead because of sin, this promise
of a future blessing implied the removal of the curse, and consequently a return
of his favor. It also implied either that God would relent, change his decree
and clear the guilty race, or else that he had some plan by which it could be
redeemed, by having man's penalty paid by another.
God did not leave Abraham in doubt as to which was his plan, but showed, by
various typical sacrifices which all who approached him had to bring, that he
could not and did not relent, nor excuse the sin; and that the only way to blot
it out and abolish its penalty would be by a sufficiency of sacrifice to meet
that penalty. This was shown to Abraham in a very significant type: Abraham's
son, in whom the promised blessing centered, had first to be a sacrifice before
he could bless, and Abraham received him from the dead in a figure. (Heb. 11:19)
In that figure Isaac typified the true seed, Christ Jesus, who died to redeem
men, in order that the redeemed might all receive the promised blessing. Had
Abraham thought that the Lord would excuse and clear the guilty, he would have
felt that God was changeable, and therefore could not have had full confidence
in the promise made to him. He might have reasoned, If God has changed his mind
once, why may he not change it again? If he relents concerning the curse of
death, may he not again relent concerning the promised favor and blessing? But
God leaves us in no such uncertainty. He gives us ample assurance of both his
justice and his unchangeableness. He could not clear the guilty, even though
he loved them so much that "he spared not his own Son, but delivered him
up [to death] for us all."
As the entire race was in Adam when he was condemned, and lost life through
him, so when Jesus "gave himself a ransom for all" his death involved
the possibility of an unborn race in his loins. A full satisfaction, or corresponding
price, for all men was thus put into the hands of Justice--to be applied "in
due time," and he who thus bought all has full authority to restore all
who come unto God by him.
"As by the offence of one, judgment came upon all men to condemnation,
even so by the righteousness of one, the free gift came upon all men unto justification
of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the
obedience of one shall many be made righteous." (Rom. 5:18,19) The proposition
is a plain one: As many as have shared death on account of Adam's sin will have
life-privileges offered to them by our Lord Jesus, who died for them and sacrificially
became Adam's substitute before the broken law, and thus "gave himself
a ransom for all." He died, "the just for the unjust, that he might
bring us to God." (1 Peter 3:18) It should never be overlooked, however,
that all of God's provisions for our race recognize the human will as a factor
in the securing of the divine favors so abundantly provided. Some have overlooked
this feature in examining the text just quoted--Rom. 5:18,19. The Apostle's
statement, however, is that, as the sentence of condemnation extended to all
the seed of Adam, even so, through the obedience of our Lord Jesus Christ to
the Father's plan, by the sacrifice of himself on our behalf, a free gift is
extended to all--a gift of forgiveness, which, if accepted, will constitute
a justification or basis for life everlasting. And "as by one man's disobedience
many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one many shall be [not were]
made righteous." If the ransom alone, without our acceptance of it, made
us righteous, then it would have read, by the obedience of one many were made
righteous.
But though the ransom-price has been given by the Redeemer only a few during
the Gospel age have been made righteous--justified--"through faith in his
blood." But since Christ is the propitiation (satisfaction) for the sins
of the whole world, all men may on this account be absolved and released from
the penalty of Adam's sin by him--under the New Covenant.
There is no unrighteousness with God; hence "If we confess our sins, he
is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
(1 John 1:9) As he would have been unjust to have allowed us to escape the pronounced
penalty before satisfaction was rendered, so also he here gives us to understand
that it would be unjust were he to forbid our restitution, since by his own
arrangement our penalty has been paid for us. The same unswerving justice that
once condemned man to death now stands pledged for the release of all who, confessing
their sins, apply for life through Christ. "It is God that justifieth--who
is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died; yea, rather, that is risen again,
who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us."
Rom. 8:33,34
The completeness of the ransom is the very strongest possible argument for the
restitution of all mankind who will accept it on the proffered terms. (Rev.
22:17) The very character of God for justice and honor stands pledged to it;
every promise which he has made implies it; and every typical sacrifice pointed
to the great and sufficient sacrifice-- "the Lamb of God, which taketh
away the SIN OF THE WORLD"--who is "the propitiation [satisfaction]
for our sins [the Church's], and not for ours only, but also for the sins of
the whole world." (John 1:29; 1 John 2:2) Since death is the penalty or
wages of sin, when the sin is canceled the wages must in due time cease. Any
other view would be both unreasonable and unjust. The fact that no recovery
from the Adamic loss is yet accomplished, though nearly two thousand years have
elapsed since our Lord died, is no more an argument against restitution than
is the fact that four thousand years elapsed before his death a proof that God
had not planned the redemption before the foundation of the world. Both the
two thousand years since and the four thousand years before the death of Christ
were appointed times for other parts of the work, preparatory to "the times
of restitution of all things."
Let no one hastily suppose that there is in this view anything in conflict with
the teaching of the Scriptures that faith toward God, repentance for sin and
reformation of character are indispensable to salvation. This feature will be
treated more at length hereafter, but we now suggest that only the few have
ever had a sufficiency of light to produce full faith, repentance and reformation.
Some have been blinded in part, and some completely, by the god of this world,
and they must be recovered from blindness as well as from death, that they,
each for himself, may have a full chance to prove, by obedience or disobedience,
their worthiness or unworthiness of life everlasting. Then those who prove themselves
unworthy of life will die again--the second death--from which there will be
no redemption, and consequently no resurrection. The death which comes on account
of Adam's sin, and all the imperfections which follow in its wake, will be removed
because of the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; but the death which comes
as a result of individual, wilful apostasy is final. This sin hath never forgiveness,
and its penalty, the second death, will be everlasting--not everlasting dying,
but everlasting death--a death unbroken by a resurrection.
Click here to go to YES answer
Click
on a question below to go directly to that question. |
||||